www.rothercommunitylinks.co.uk

Welcome
Our very own welcome page - and all about us

What`s going on?
If you do not click this link you will never find out!

Discussion board
Let rip!

RCL Members
not many listed as they are a shy hardworking bunch

County Councillors
we all love `em

District Councillors
a fine body of men
and women

Consultation
The County Council
wants your views

Consultation
so does Rother District Council

MPs
Members of Parliament

MEPs
go right to the top

Resources
bring your group up to speed

Media Links
get the power of the press on your side

Join us
go on: it`s free!

Contact us
send us a message

Login
a special place just for our members
 

 

What`s going on?
21st January 2003

ROTHER COMMUNITY LINKS
Members Meeting
Brede Village Hall, Brede
27
th June 2002

1. Introduction and Welcome
Sandy Lazarus, Chair of Rother Community Links (RCL), gave a warm welcome to members and introduced the meeting. The purpose of the morning was to enable members to meet each other, to brief members about progress in the establishment of Rother Community Links and to discuss the key issues for the community and voluntary sector in relation to the development of a Community Strategy for the Rother area.

2. Address by Sandy Lazarus, Chair of RCL:
Work of the Steering Group
Sandy brought those present up to date on the work of the Steering Group formed after the inaugural meeting in November 2001. The membership, Terms of Reference and structure of the Steering group had been agreed. Four sub-groups had been formed to take forward the work of RCL: Communication; Representation; Consultation and Community views; Resources. A list of current members of the Steering Group would be forwarded to members with a report of the meeting.

Early Consultation
Sandy reminded members that RCL was created for the purpose of consultation on the planning and delivery of services for the communities of Rother. There is now a statutory requirement for consultation whereby statutory agencies and those in receipt of public money need to demonstrate taking account of community needs. This is best served by a collective voice for the voluntary/community sector having its say in the nature and quality of services provided. This is particularly important where there is a responsibility for the voluntary sector to lead or assist in providing services and to participate in changes to the pattern of services within Rother.

Progress To Date
Since November 2001, Terms of Reference have been set up which commit RCL to enabling its members to participate in consultation, to running two development seminars every year and to providing a website for consultation and information exchange. Funding had been secured from East Sussex County Council Social Services, the Bexhill and Rother Primary Care Trust (PCT) and Rother District Council. Most significantly, RCL were now in the process of taking on a seconded Development Worker from the PCT, whose main task would be to develop the organisation and to secure funding for the future. Advertising for this post would be going out soon. It had been agreed that the Rye and District Council for Voluntary Service (RDCVS) would undertake the accommodation for and supervision of this post.

A website for the RCL is still in early stages and will serve as an interactive mechanism for exchange of information and key tool for consultation. It is recognised that there is a need for a co-operative approach to sharing information, discussing issues and coming together as a collective voice. The address for the RCL website is www.rothercommunitylinks.co.uk.

Current Consultations
Mental Wellbeing Strategy - there is currently a call by the East Sussex, Brighton and Hove Health Authority for groups to be involved in the consultation and planning of services for the mental health support structure in Rother. On the same topic, Sandy mentioned that sessions are available for training of volunteers in mental health awareness through the Bexhill and Rother PCT initiative "Care Pathways for People with Mental Health Problems". Andrea Talbot of Rother area Age Concern gave an account on the worthwhile training available through "Mind Matters".

Housing Strategy Consultation - Rother District Council Housing Consultation forms were available for groups to make their views known in the formulation of the authority’s housing strategy. Anne Fennessy, from Rother District Council Housing Department, urged members to be involved in this consultation.

It was stressed that extending membership of the RCL was very important and all groups should be encouraged to sign up as members for updating and participation in important matters affecting their work. Membership of the RCL Steering Group is open if groups wished to become more involved.

The question was raised from the floor as to whether consultation is needed to quite such a degree and also why everything appeared to have the label "strategic". It was generally agreed that there were significant benefits to being involved in the planning of community services and a need for the knowledge of voluntary and community groups to be included from the outset in proposals for change in service delivery.

3. Address by Councillor Graham Gubby, Rother District Council:
Community Strategy
The Rother Community Strategy was introduced by Cllr Graham Gubby, who underlined the importance of consultation and of the recent welcome changes across the statutory sector towards a commitment to consultative and better co-ordinated approaches to the planning and delivery of services.

Councillor Gubby emphasised the benefits of the involvement of the voluntary/community sector in ensuring the quality of local life. He suggested that organisations such as RCL could contribute significantly to the formal participation of the voluntary/community sector in consultation processes.

Councillor Gubby gave assurances that Rother District Council is genuinely trying to listen to people and intends to build future services around the demands of the community. He explained that the Council has a duty to prepare a Community Strategy in association with a Local Strategic Partnership (LSP), which would look to provide improvements in the wellbeing, social, economic and environmental, of those who lived and worked in the district. However, it is not the Council’s intention to rush into an LSP but to consult first with the community on its priorities, then to create an LSP in response to the needs and priorities expressed. The LSP will then evolve and will need to be flexible in relation to changing community needs.

It was agreed that a reminder be issued in the local press for members of the public to send back the "Tell Us What You Think" questionnaires.

Councillor Gubby confirmed that Rother’s Cabinet and Scrutiny Committees would be examining the work of the LSP after it is set up. There should also be an alignment of local performance indicators, as set out in the statutory sector performance plans, with LSP targets once established. The role of Rother District Councillors will be to act as community leaders. Cllr. Gubby expressed the hope that the voluntary sector will take an enthusiastic interest in consultative arrangements and in the evolution of the LSP and the Community Strategy. He undertook to give feedback on issues raised from the consultation and expressed the hope that in turn representatives of voluntary and community groups would undertake to keep their members informed.

4. Discussion Session A discussion then took place from the floor.

  • Brede Parish Council: the response to their recent questionnaire among residents of Brede showed the need for recognition of the flexibility and variety needed in services in different communities, particularly in relation to the difference between urban and rural problems. They also highlighted transport problems, including the reliance on cars in the rural areas.
  • Age Concern: representatives asked where they could obtain a list of the Scrutiny Committee membership and were advised to look to the Rother website – www.rother.gov.uk, in the Rother District Council Annual Performance Plan or to ring the Town Hall at Bexhill on (01424) 787878.
  • The suggestion was made that Rother District Councillors might make themselves better known in the community and be available to ordinary residents.
  • Rye Harbour Residents Association: there was a need for the community consultation to be thorough.

Other comments and views included:

  • Not all issues that affect communities are Rother District Council issues, for example education and transport. It was pointed out that the Community Strategy was for the area as a whole, across all service providers; public, private and voluntary/community.
  • Need for a link to the East Sussex County Council Strategic Plan.
  • Need for accurate mapping of provision of voluntary/community sector and for awareness of potential contribution.
  • South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) / South East England Regional Assembly (SEERA) – the opportunity presented by local consultation in Rother may be threatened by the regionalisation agenda whereby decisions would be taken for the South East as a whole. Concern was also expressed about SEEDA’s aim to work with larger strategic delivery mechanisms such as the East Sussex Strategic Partnership, which may adversely affect local autonomy.
  • Concern was also expressed about a perceived lack of democratic mandate and seeming preference for non-elected appointees at the regional and local level. It was broadly agreed that there was a need for genuine, robust local service planning to stop regionalisation/centralisation at the expense of local decision-making. Need to localise debate – over several years this has eroded towards centralisation of services. Careful selection of the right people to represent the District should to be considered.
  • Cllr. Gubby responded that under his leadership, Rother District Council would fight robustly to hold on to local decision making, as, in his view, the South East was too large to both function centrally and deliver appropriately at the local level.
  • Concern was expressed over the make-up of LSPs – there was perhaps a danger that those involved may not be able to deliver on priorities such as police and health, especially non-elected members. The question of expenses for LSP members was raised. There was clearly a need to establish a co-ordinated way to achieve efficiencies within the Local Strategic Partnership

5. Any Other Business
Age Concern requested a large print copy of the consultation document, "Tell Us What You Think!" for the partially sighted. Brenda Mason agreed to forward copies to Andrea Talbot.

6. Close
Sandy Lazarus drew the meeting to a close with a vote of thanks to Cllr. Gubby for a valuable contribution to Rother Community Links’ work. She thanked all those who had attended and encouraged them to remain involved with RCL and to encourage other groups to join.

For any comments or questions concerning the meeting or Rother Community Links please contact Sandy Lazarus at RCL, c/o Rye and District CVS, 25 Cinque Ports Street, Rye, TN31 7AD
(01797) 225466 to leave a message.

For copies of the community consultation document, "Tell Us What You Think!" or for details about Rother Community Strategy please contact Brenda Mason at Rother District Council, 14 Beeching Road, Bexhill, East Sussex TN39 3LG
(01424) 787581,
mailto:brenda.mason@rother.gov.uk

For the latest news, click here

mailto: